<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Does Saddam go to hell?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.PieAndCoffee.org/2007/01/01/saddam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.PieAndCoffee.org/2007/01/01/saddam/</link> <description>&#34;When things speed up hierarchy disappears and global theater sets in.&#34; --Marshall McLuhan</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:46:19 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: HAK</title><link>http://www.PieAndCoffee.org/2007/01/01/saddam/comment-page-1/#comment-12492</link> <dc:creator>HAK</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 07:24:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.PieAndCoffee.org/2007/01/01/a-comment/#comment-12492</guid> <description>Well, ancient Romans had something kind of like a &quot;title for those consigned to hell&quot;:  when a &quot;bad&quot; emperor died, they would formally damn his memory.  The standards of what constitutes &quot;bad,&quot; though, can be questionable--one famous emperor whose memory was nearly damned after his death was Hadrian, now remembered as one of the four &quot;good emperors,&quot; the Antonines--although the near-damnation of his memories was actually quite well-earned by the harshness with which he dealt with his enemies, no doubt.
This does raise an interesting issue, though:  there is a move to canonize Emperor Charles of Austria, the last Habsburg emperor (he has already been beatified in 2004).  Regardless of his personal virtues, I find it a little disturbing that someone who was involved, however indirectly, with the massive human tragedy like World War I as the leader of one of the combatant nations is being considered for sainthood.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, ancient Romans had something kind of like a &#8220;title for those consigned to hell&#8221;:  when a &#8220;bad&#8221; emperor died, they would formally damn his memory.  The standards of what constitutes &#8220;bad,&#8221; though, can be questionable&#8211;one famous emperor whose memory was nearly damned after his death was Hadrian, now remembered as one of the four &#8220;good emperors,&#8221; the Antonines&#8211;although the near-damnation of his memories was actually quite well-earned by the harshness with which he dealt with his enemies, no doubt.</p><p>This does raise an interesting issue, though:  there is a move to canonize Emperor Charles of Austria, the last Habsburg emperor (he has already been beatified in 2004).  Regardless of his personal virtues, I find it a little disturbing that someone who was involved, however indirectly, with the massive human tragedy like World War I as the leader of one of the combatant nations is being considered for sainthood.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam (Southern California)</title><link>http://www.PieAndCoffee.org/2007/01/01/saddam/comment-page-1/#comment-12283</link> <dc:creator>Adam (Southern California)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:42:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.PieAndCoffee.org/2007/01/01/a-comment/#comment-12283</guid> <description>Several years ago I was having a discussion with a non-religious friend of mine who found it interesting that a title existed for those we could confirm had been taken into heaven, but no counterpart existed for those we could confirm had gone the other way. I.e., there&#039;s &quot;Saint Maximilian Kolbe,&quot; but no, for example, &quot;Damned Adolf Hitler.&quot; Of course, we&#039;ve never established any kind of process for determining the afterlife status of those we haven&#039;t canonized.
I&#039;ve always been careful not to presume that I can predict God&#039;s judgement. I said a quick prayer on Saddam&#039;s behalf upon hearing of his execution even though his was one of the rare cases in which I felt his execution was justified. I think the prayer was broader than just for Saddam&#039;s soul --- does God&#039;s infinite mercy extend to a villain like Saddam Hussein? If so, then surely the rest (such as his executioners, for example) of us have a chance. Or do we? Ultimately this is unknowable and we have to trust in God and our own consciences.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several years ago I was having a discussion with a non-religious friend of mine who found it interesting that a title existed for those we could confirm had been taken into heaven, but no counterpart existed for those we could confirm had gone the other way. I.e., there&#8217;s &#8220;Saint Maximilian Kolbe,&#8221; but no, for example, &#8220;Damned Adolf Hitler.&#8221; Of course, we&#8217;ve never established any kind of process for determining the afterlife status of those we haven&#8217;t canonized.</p><p>I&#8217;ve always been careful not to presume that I can predict God&#8217;s judgement. I said a quick prayer on Saddam&#8217;s behalf upon hearing of his execution even though his was one of the rare cases in which I felt his execution was justified. I think the prayer was broader than just for Saddam&#8217;s soul &#8212; does God&#8217;s infinite mercy extend to a villain like Saddam Hussein? If so, then surely the rest (such as his executioners, for example) of us have a chance. Or do we? Ultimately this is unknowable and we have to trust in God and our own consciences.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
