<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: I&#8217;m on a public panel Thursday</title> <atom:link href="http://www.PieAndCoffee.org/2007/03/12/im-on-a-public-panel-thursday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.PieAndCoffee.org/2007/03/12/im-on-a-public-panel-thursday/</link> <description>&#34;When things speed up hierarchy disappears and global theater sets in.&#34; --Marshall McLuhan</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:46:19 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.PieAndCoffee.org/2007/03/12/im-on-a-public-panel-thursday/comment-page-1/#comment-26084</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:39:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.PieAndCoffee.org/2007/03/12/im-on-a-public-panel-thursday/#comment-26084</guid> <description>Noted airport blogger Bill Randell is on the panel, so you can bet there will be lots of airport-related discussion. &lt;a href=&quot;http://worcesterma.blogspot.com/2007/03/massport-negotiations.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt; is his take on confidentiality during the negotiations.
This morning I am really sick, but if I get better I still hope to be a panelist.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noted airport blogger Bill Randell is on the panel, so you can bet there will be lots of airport-related discussion. <a
href="http://worcesterma.blogspot.com/2007/03/massport-negotiations.html" rel="nofollow">Here</a> is his take on confidentiality during the negotiations.</p><p>This morning I am really sick, but if I get better I still hope to be a panelist.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Shannon</title><link>http://www.PieAndCoffee.org/2007/03/12/im-on-a-public-panel-thursday/comment-page-1/#comment-26005</link> <dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:27:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.PieAndCoffee.org/2007/03/12/im-on-a-public-panel-thursday/#comment-26005</guid> <description>Sounds like a great event.  I&#039;ll have to check out the broadcast but the subject is as timely as could be.
Just tonight at the City Council meeting, there was a tense exchange between the councillors about whether or not discussing Worcester Airport at this stage is actually compromising the city&#039;s negotiations with MassPort.  Some thought it should now be behind-closed-doors only while Rosen felt that we have a responsibility to have public discourse about backroom deals that ultimately affect us all (I&#039;m paraphrasing of course).  So for suggestions, I&#039;d be curious about this idea of privacy during dealmaking.  What levels of confidentiality are required or expected?  With no input or insight into the process, all&#039;s quiet until the outcome.  Obviously I&#039;m thinking about the lack of transparency with the city&#039;s contract with Charter and any Walmart deal developments.
On a personal note, I have only begun to understand how difficult it can be for the average resident to get information about a government process, particularly interdepartmental ones.  How does a city project get approved?  I&#039;d love a workflow diagram with swimlanes, but I&#039;d settle for a good narrative.  How many people do I have to talk to in order to piece it all together?  I can be fairly articulate, so I can&#039;t imagine if I had a language barrier.  Ugh sorry, lack of sleep is forcing me to rant.
Well, good luck tomorrow!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a great event.  I&#8217;ll have to check out the broadcast but the subject is as timely as could be.</p><p>Just tonight at the City Council meeting, there was a tense exchange between the councillors about whether or not discussing Worcester Airport at this stage is actually compromising the city&#8217;s negotiations with MassPort.  Some thought it should now be behind-closed-doors only while Rosen felt that we have a responsibility to have public discourse about backroom deals that ultimately affect us all (I&#8217;m paraphrasing of course).  So for suggestions, I&#8217;d be curious about this idea of privacy during dealmaking.  What levels of confidentiality are required or expected?  With no input or insight into the process, all&#8217;s quiet until the outcome.  Obviously I&#8217;m thinking about the lack of transparency with the city&#8217;s contract with Charter and any Walmart deal developments.</p><p>On a personal note, I have only begun to understand how difficult it can be for the average resident to get information about a government process, particularly interdepartmental ones.  How does a city project get approved?  I&#8217;d love a workflow diagram with swimlanes, but I&#8217;d settle for a good narrative.  How many people do I have to talk to in order to piece it all together?  I can be fairly articulate, so I can&#8217;t imagine if I had a language barrier.  Ugh sorry, lack of sleep is forcing me to rant.</p><p>Well, good luck tomorrow!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
