<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: 508 #29: Dio has rocked for a long, long time</title> <atom:link href="http://www.PieAndCoffee.org/2008/04/04/508-029/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.PieAndCoffee.org/2008/04/04/508-029/</link> <description>&#34;When things speed up hierarchy disappears and global theater sets in.&#34; --Marshall McLuhan</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:46:19 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.PieAndCoffee.org/2008/04/04/508-029/comment-page-1/#comment-204621</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 16:37:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.PieAndCoffee.org/2008/04/04/508-029/#comment-204621</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rmi.org/sitepages/pid467.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Forget Nuclear&quot;&lt;/a&gt; is a new summary of the general economic case against nuclear power, which I mentioned in passing in this episode.
&lt;blockquote&gt;Most remarkably, comparing all options’ ability to protect the earth’s climate and enhance energy security reveals why nuclear power could never deliver these promised benefits even if it could find free-market buyers—while its carbon-free rivals, which won $71 billion of private investment in 2007 alone, do offer highly effective climate and security solutions, sooner, with greater confidence.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://www.rmi.org/sitepages/pid467.php" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Forget Nuclear&#8221;</a> is a new summary of the general economic case against nuclear power, which I mentioned in passing in this episode.</p><blockquote><p>Most remarkably, comparing all options’ ability to protect the earth’s climate and enhance energy security reveals why nuclear power could never deliver these promised benefits even if it could find free-market buyers—while its carbon-free rivals, which won $71 billion of private investment in 2007 alone, do offer highly effective climate and security solutions, sooner, with greater confidence.</p></blockquote> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
