<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 508 #69: Vegetarian renaissance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.PieAndCoffee.org/2009/05/22/508-69-vegetarian-renaissance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.PieAndCoffee.org/2009/05/22/508-69-vegetarian-renaissance/</link>
	<description>religion, activism, hospitality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:11:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.PieAndCoffee.org/2009/05/22/508-69-vegetarian-renaissance/comment-page-1/#comment-444928</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 21:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.PieAndCoffee.org/?p=1881#comment-444928</guid>
		<description>Note that the New York Times owns the T&amp;G.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that the New York Times owns the T&amp;G.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam (Southern California)</title>
		<link>http://www.PieAndCoffee.org/2009/05/22/508-69-vegetarian-renaissance/comment-page-1/#comment-444856</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam (Southern California)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 18:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.PieAndCoffee.org/?p=1881#comment-444856</guid>
		<description>That weird electronic edition of the T&amp;G reminds me of something the NYT did about 5 years ago or so where they made an &quot;electronic version&quot; of the paper that was basically a pdf of the paper&#039;s pages, although again it was some other program, and you had to scroll all around to see the whole page. This struck me as being one of the most useless interfaces I&#039;d ever seen online, combining the worst elements of both print and online reading, and was surprised to see it pop up again in Worcester.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That weird electronic edition of the T&#038;G reminds me of something the NYT did about 5 years ago or so where they made an &#8220;electronic version&#8221; of the paper that was basically a pdf of the paper&#8217;s pages, although again it was some other program, and you had to scroll all around to see the whole page. This struck me as being one of the most useless interfaces I&#8217;d ever seen online, combining the worst elements of both print and online reading, and was surprised to see it pop up again in Worcester.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
